Latest Post

Formal and Informal Learning: Why a balance between the two is required in a workplace?

Image
Learning, as we all know, is part of life. The workplace is considered a legitimate environment for learning new skills and gaining knowledge that enhances an employee’s morale and encourages their participation in work-related activities. One can even say that work and learning are synonymous as when employees invest time in work activities their experiences accumulate. They get a better understanding of their role in the organization and its importance. In today’s fast-moving corporate environment, learning new skills and honing pre-existing capabilities is essential, and without the right tools, an employee may fall behind.  Corporate employees must continuously modify and update their working habits to sustain competitive advantage, remain employable and perform well. To help employees establish themselves better in the work environment and boost performance, companies come up with various opportunities and provide learning platforms. Through these opportunities, employees integrat

How micro-management can destroy an entire team in an office


Teamwork is all about the synergy between the members. Any individual no matter how adroit he is can't accomplish all by himself. A robust team will always deliver. But if the members are not allowed to work in an unrestricted environment,  the efficiency of the team as a whole will fall. When the leader or manager tries to control or take everything in his hands, the one's under him are sure to despise his methods and won't like to work there. Micromanagement is the perfect example of this shortcoming.


In this system, the manager monitors the job of associates or employees. Micromanagement typically has a negative point. Actually, most of us observe it as an attempt by the administration trying to gouge its fingers into how a person is doing the work.

In this article, we will help you curb this kind of mistake. Learn how to identify when you see a micromanager and also how to get rid of a system running on micromanagement.


What is micromanagement?


Micromanagement is the absolute restraining supervision technique. It’s discouraging and counter-intuitive, as the need to regulate everything to make sure all goes according to schedule, only generates more dilemmas in the long-term. The dilemmas start when the employees are forced to haste, report back the situation repetitively. 

Even in circumstances where the pros of micromanagement are authorized to gleam through, it sometimes isn’t worth the long-term problems and awful patterns such a system builds.


How to spot a Micromanager?


When working under someone you will obviously be prepared to get some orders and execute the task as instructed. After that, you will like to work autonomously on your task. They should be easily accessible to discuss without interfering with the work directly and hindering your work.

But if the person assigning the tasks does not leave and rather observes you, it will be arduous to concentrate on your work. 

If you are criticized for the subtlest mistake or for performing a job, not in a procedure of their preference, then you are certainly being micromanaged. 

Critical drawbacks of Micromanagement that will demolish an entire team in an office. 


These are the 5 main negative points about micromanagement


Drawback 1 - Diminution of trust in the team


Taking everything in your own hands will always damage the trust of employees on their heads. Micromanagement will ultimately steer to an enormous loss of trust between the manager and his staff. Your subordinates will no longer see you as a supervisor, but a dictator whose only desire is to control everything happening in the office. This eventually leads to 2 problems.  considerable loss of productivity and depletion of employees. 
The second one is far fetched but can certainly happen.

Conclusion- Faith and trust go hand in hand. You need to trust your subordinates first to gain theirs. If you fail your team will collapse. 


Drawback 2 - lose the grip over the team


When you try to micromanage your company officials, you curb yourself by which supervision methods you have at your disposal until the only tool you have in reach is control. But the downside of using control as the only method of management, you will certainly be deprived of it. Instead of attaining control over your team, you fail at it grimly. It’s crucial to understand that there are multiple plausible management attitudes and every staff worker responds differently to each.

Conclusion - if you can't increase the way you approach your staff, your proficiency to express and furthermore your ability to organize will deteriorate.


Drawback 3 -  Staff overlying on the manager


One of the outcomes of micromanagement is that your staff will be always hinging on you before taking any action. This will be detrimental to their self-confidence. Micromanagement affects your company to think like it's of utmost importance to have your constant guidance. Dependent hands take more time and struggle to complete a task, which can take a tariff on your schedule and endurance. You must know that your staffers were originally employed as they had unique abilities and put forward their skills, capabilities, and discernment. Office workers should be autonomous and self-sufficient, they’ll continue to think on their own—and when employees have the freedom to think on their own, great things can happen. 

Takeaway: Micromanagement will degrade the skill set of your team members. All employees will become sheep who can only follow.  You must allow your employees the independence to speculate and function with free will.


Drawback 4 - Staff relinquishing 


Many people oppose it when they think they are in control. So to escape this situation they quit their jobs. People don't try to comprehend why someone is trying to control them. Whatever the reason they have like ego, naivety, pedant, pomposity to be control freak, it’s hardly worth the high quitting rate. It takes a lot of time and capital to hire new staff and retrain them. Apart from that it also deprives the tempo your department had, and it also compels your corporation to mislay the competent and productive employees it once had. Also, new members take time to adjust themselves according to the present condition of the office. 

Conclusion- office elements will be lost if you micromanage. 


Drawback 5- No new ideas and innovation


This is the most adverse effect of micromanagement on your staff. Your team has to work with the project and everything lies in their hands. You can just tell them what they are doing is right or wrong and guide them accordingly. In the process, you should always accept their fresh ideas and techniques. They may be wrong but not giving them the chance to speak up will surely crush their spirits. 

Conclusion: Innovation distinguishes between a leader and a follower was rightly quoted by Steve Jobs. You need to open up to listen to what others have to say. 

You can now spot the errors in your way of management. Trusting and giving freedom of space to your fellow office workers will help them surpass your expectations. Having an unrestricted and friendly ambiance will enhance the output if your office.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Author Bio:

Name: Shivang Saxena


A 22-year-old, writer-entrepreneur based in India, who prefers to tell stories and write about everything with a touch of life. He has been helping startups and technologies with their content strategies. He's currently working on his book named "Too Many Thoughts, Too Much life".

Visit his blog thevagabondsworld.wordpress.com


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Present Issues and Trends in Health Psychology

Formal and Informal Learning: Why a balance between the two is required in a workplace?